Petitioner filed a civil revision under Article 226 for early disposal of another petition. Court dismissed the revision as infructuous after respondent counsel stated the underlying matter had been disposed of. No costs awarded.
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(PD)No. 3766 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P(PD)No. 3766 of 2018
G.K.Srinivasan ...Petitioner
Vs.
N.P.Yasodha ...Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, seeking for early disposal of H.M.O.P.No. 69 of 2015 on the file of
the Sub-Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Parthasarathy
O R D E R
Mr.S.Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the respondent would
submit that the H.M.O.P.No. 69 of 2015 has been disposed of. The learned
counsel for the petitioner is unable to affirm or deny the same.
1/3
C.R.P(PD)No. 3766 of 2018
this revision, this civil revision petition is dismissed of having become
infructuous recording the statement made by Mr.S.Parthasarathy. No costs. Liberty to the counsels, is reserved, if the statement is found to be incorrect.
18.12.2020
kkn
Internet:Yes
Index:No
Non-speaking.
To:
The Sub-Court,
Gobichettipalayam.
2/3
C.R.P(PD)No. 3766 of 2018
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
KKN
C.R.P(PD)No. 3766 of 2018
18.12.2020
3/3
G.K. Srinivasan
N.P. Yasodha
R. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
