Kaliammal v. Kaliammal
Case brief
What is this about?
This brief order records the death of the petitioner without her legal heirs being impleaded. The civil revision petition was dismissed as having abated nature.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
CRP.(NPD).No.3525 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 04.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.3525 of 2013
Kaliammal ... Petitioner
Versus
1.Kaliammal
2.Nalla Gounder
3.Eswaran ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 14.03.2013 made in
I.A.No.287 of 2012 in I.A.No.544 of 2010 in I.A.No.171 of 2007 in
O.S.No.108 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge,
Gobichettipalayam.
For petitioner : Mr.P.R.Balasubramanian
For Respondents : Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel (for R1 & R3)
: R2 – Died
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has reported that the petitioner
is dead on 22.12.2015. Though sufficient opportunities were given to the petitioner, till date, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated with liberty to move appropriate application, if the legal heirs of the petitioner warrants so to do. No costs.
04.02.2020
Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking/Non-Speaking order
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kaliammal
- respondent
Kaliammal
- respondent
Nalla Gounder
- respondent
Eswaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court