This suo moto Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 226/227, was dismissed as infructuous since the underlying original petition had been withdrawn, without detailed discussion.
None other than dismissal of the revision petition as infructuous and closure of connected CMP.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.2902 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.2902 of 2016 and
C.M.P.No.14774 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing) K.Ilayaraja .. Petitioner Vs. R.Thamizharasi .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 10.06.2016 made in I.A.No.203 of 2015 in H.M.O.P.No.115 of 2015 on the file of the Sub-Ordinate Court at Nagapattinam.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.S.Jhothivani For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that since the
original petition in H.M.O.P.No.115 of 2015 had already been withdrawn,
this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. In view of
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(PD).No.2902 of 2016
arb
the same, recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No
costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
11.12.2020
arb
Internet: Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
To
The Sub-Ordinate Court,
Nagapattinam.
C.R.P.(PD).No.2902 of 2016
and
C.M.P.No.14774 of 2016
2/2
K.Ilayaraja
R.Thamizharasi
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
