S. Shankar v. C. Suguna
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petitions filed under Sections 115 CPC and Article 226/227 of the Constitution were dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite a notice.
What did the court decide?
No costs awarded.
What the court decided
C.R.P. NPD 2627 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.01.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
C.R.P. (NPD) 2627 & 2628 of 2015
S.Shankar ... Petitioner in
both C.R.P.s
Versus
1. C.Suguna
2. S.Ramalingam
3. S.Kumar
4. P.Samundeeswari ... Respondents in
both C.R.P.s
PRAYER in C.R.P. NPD 2627 of 2015 : Civil Revision Petition
is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the order and decree dated 06.01.2015 made in I.A. 842 of 2011 in O.S. 140 of 2003 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.
PRAYER in C.R.P. NPD 2628 of 2015 : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order and decree dated 06.01.2015 made in I.A. 843 of 2011 in O.S. 140 of 2003 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.
1/3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Shankar
- respondent
C. Suguna
- respondent
S. Ramalingam
- respondent
S. Kumar
- respondent
P. Samundeeswari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court