Angamuthu S/O. Chinnaiyan v. Chinnaponnu W/O. Govindan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, confirming the Trial Court's order setting aside an ex-parte decree. The revision petitioners failed; the Court enhanced the costs payable by respondents to Rs.1,500 and directed completion of trial within 16 weeks.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed confirming the order to set aside ex-parte decree upon payment of enhanced costs of Rs.1,500. Trial completion directed within 16 weeks.
What the court decided
CRP.(NPD).No.1411 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 17.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP.(NPD).No.1411 of 2010
and
MP.No.1 of 2010
1.Angamuthu
2.Sumathi
3.Angammal
4.Baby
5.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioners
Versus
1.Chinnaponnu
2.Saroja
3.Vijayakumar
4.Kavitha
5.Rajendran
6.Jaganathan
7.Natarajan
8.Logambal
9.Mahdewari ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 21.10.2009 in I.A.No.732 of 2008 in O.S.No.200 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur.
For petitioners : Mr.D.Sivakumaran For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER
The plaintiffs are the revision petitioners herein.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court erred in allowing the application to set aside the ex-parte decree and condoning the delay.
Whether the costs awarded by the Trial Court should be enhanced upon revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Angamuthu
- petitioner
Sumathi
- petitioner
Angammal
- petitioner
Baby
- petitioner
Vijayalakshmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court