Dismissed

M.Sakthivel, v. S.Gunajeyanthi

Madras HC23 Jul 2020CRL RC(MD)/871/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision petition filed against a judgment confirming a Domestic Violence Act order, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous on the grounds that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and the DV proceedings were closed before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision petition was dismissed as infructuous and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

M.Sakthivel, Vs S.Gunajeyanthi — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.871 of 2016

¶2

M.Sakthivel

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.07.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.871 of 2016

¶7

and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.12725 of 2016

... Petitioner

versus

S.Gunajeyanthi

... Respondent

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 14.06.2016 made in Crl.A.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul, confirming the order dated 14.08.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2459 of 2015 in D.V.O.P.No.6 of 2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.

¶13

For Petitioner :

¶14

Mr.F.Deepak

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.S.Sarvaganprabhu

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed as against the Judgment dated 14.06.2016 made in Crl.A.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul, confirming the order dated 14.08.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2459 of 2015 in D.V.O.P.No.6 of 2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.

¶18

It is submitted by Mr.Deepak, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/husband and Mr.Sarvaganprabhu, learned counsel for the respondent/wife that pending this revision, the dispute was amicably solved between the parties before the trial Court and the proceeding initiated under the Domestic Violence Act has also been closed. Therefore, this Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous.

¶19

Recording the submissions made on either side that the dispute between the parties has been solved amicably before the trial Court and the proceeding initiated under the Domestic Violence Act has been closed, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Assistant Registrar (Records)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

1/3

¶24

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.871 of 2016

¶25

ogy

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶29

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.

¶30

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.871 of 2016l 23.07.2020l

¶31

sma/31/07/2020/2p/3c

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/3

M.Sakthivel, v. S.Gunajeyanthi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sakthivel, v. S.Gunajeyanthi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.James Peter Jesudoss Vs the Inspector of Police

Bennet @ Bennet Yesudas Vs Arumuga Nainar

Gurunatha Muthalagi Vs Venkatachalam

N.Mani, Vs Jayabalan

Kanaga Mary John Vs Tamilselvi

D.Siluvai Venance Vs The Inspector of Police