5.This Court has also perused the complaint filed by the petitioner. On perusal of the same, it is seen that the petitioner has made several allegations against the first respondent, the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. One of the allegations made at paragraph No.6 of the complaint is that the first respondent married another person, however, in the next paragraph, he has stated that the first respondent is prepared to marry some other person. The petitioner claims to be a practising Advocate of the bar, has made a contra statement in paragraph Nos.6 and 7 of the complaint, which itself shows that there is no merit in the complaint. If there is a defamatory statement made in the maintenance petition filed by the first respondent, it is open to the petitioner to canvass all those grounds before the Family Court, wherein the I.D.O.P.No.52 of 2013 is pending. Instead of filing the appropriate petition before the Family Court, filing the present complaint is unsustainable one. Hence, I do not find any error in the order passed by the trial Court. This Court also finds that there is no prima facie case to proceed further and paragraph Nos.6 and 7 of the impugned complaint https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ itself are sufficient to dismiss the complaint in limine.
