P.W.2 are interested and inimical witnesses. The occurrence in this case was taken place on 07.07.2006 at 5.30 a.m. when P.W.1 de-facto complainant was cleaning in front of her house and at that time, the second accused started wordy altercation, which resulted in the occurrence. This revision petitioner / A1, husband of the second accused on seeing the quarrel between with his wife and P.W.1, by questioning how dares she could fight with his wife, went inside the house, brought back with Suri Knife, attacked P.W.1 de-facto complainant, which was resisted by P.W.2 - Rajapandi, her son and P.W.2 has also sustained injuries on his left thumb finger and ring finger. The revision petitioner / A1 also said to have attacked P.W.1 de-facto complainant with brick stone on her right ear. The victims P.W.1 and P.W.2 were taken to a Government Hospital, where P.W.8 Doctor has examined them and also issued a wound certificate. The Courts below considering the evidence, found the revision petitioner guilty and merely because, the independent witnesses, who were examined in this case, turned hostile, the benefit cannot be extended to the revision petitioner.
