The High Court of Madras granted permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn following the endorsement of withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision granted; suit dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 07.02.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.R.C.No.810 of 2018
J.Gopi .. Petitioner
Vs
1. G.Radhika
2. Pavithra .. Respondents
Prayer:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read
with 401 of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order dated
16.04.2018 made in M.C.No.319 of 2016 on the file of the
learned V Additional Principal Judge, V Additional Family
Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner :Mr.G.Saravanankumar
For Respondents : Mr.J.R.M.Bhavananthan
ORDER
Learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the present Revision Case
and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the same, permission is granted.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CCC)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
tsi
To
The V Additional Principal Judge,
V Additional Family Court, Chennai.
1/2
copy to
The Section Officer Criminal Section High Court Madras
+1 cc to Mr.J.R.K.Bhavananthan Advocate sr11001
Crl.R.C.No.810/2018
mp(co)
aa17/03/2020
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Criminal Revision is maintainable when the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition before a decision?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
J. Gopi
G. Radhika
Pavithra
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
