Allowed

Durgadevi v. State Rep.by

Madras HC28 Aug 2020CRL RC/598/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal revision to set aside interim order dismissing petition for interim custody of seized tractor. Court ordered release subject to deposit, personal bond, undertaking, and submission of photographic evidence.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 23.06.2020 set aside; vehicle to be released to petitioner on conditions of deposit, bond, undertaking, and RC book surrender within 7 days.

Durgadevi Vs State Rep.by — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.08.2020

¶3

CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
Crl.R.C.No.598 of 2020
Durgadevi ... Petitioner/
owner of the vehicle
Vs.
State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Poombuhar Police Station,
Nagapattinam District.
(Crime No.28 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.
seeking to set aside the order dated 23.06.2020 passed in
Crl.M.P.No.1561 of 2020 on the file of the District and Sessions
Court, Nagapattinam.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vinoth
For Respondent : Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal
Government Advocate
(Crl. Side)
O R D E R

¶4

This case is taken up through video conferencing.

¶5

This criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 23.06.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1561 of 2020 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam.

¶6

The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle (New Holland Tractor) bearing Registration No.TN-82-Y-1046 and let the same on hire. The petitioner's vehicle was seized on 28.03.2020, while transporting 1½ unit of savudu sand and a case was

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

registered in Crime No.28 of 2020 for the offences under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957. The petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.1561 of 2020 before the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam, under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for interim custody of the vehicle, which was dismissed on 23.06.2020, challenging which, the petitioner has preferred the present revision petition.

¶9

Heard Mr.M.Vinoth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent/State.

¶10

It is seen that the seizure was effected on 28.03.2020 and the vehicle is in the police station open to sun and rain.

¶11

Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and in view of the guidelines given by the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat¹ , this Court is of the view that interests of justice will be served, if the vehicle is ordered to be released to the petitioner on certain stringent conditions. The respondent police is directed to grant interim custody of the said vehicle (New Holland Tractor) bearing Registration No.TN-82-Y-1046 to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :

¶12

(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the Tahsildar, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust, Nagapattinam as non-refundable deposit;

¶13

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam. The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and give the copies of their Aadhaar Card;

¶14

1(2002) 10 SCC 290

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

(iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent/ authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondent and also the trial Court, failing which the respondent/trial Court is at liberty to confiscate the vehicle;

¶17

(iv) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned;

¶18

(v) The petitioner shall take photograph of the vehicle and submit the same along with Compact Disc duly certified under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872;

¶19

(vi) The petitioner shall surrender the original R.C. book before the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam; and

¶20

(vii) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondent.

¶21

Petition relating to return of R.C. Book for any purpose in the future, may be filed before the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam, who may consider the same on merits, though this order has been passed by the High Court.

¶22

This petition is allowed in the above terms and the order dated 23.06.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1561 of 2020 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam, is set aside.

¶23

Assistant Registrar

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

¶28

1.The District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam.

¶29

2.The Tahsildar, Nagapattinam.

¶30

3.The District Mines and Minerals
Foundation Trust, Nagapattinam.
4.The Inspector of Police,
Poombuhar Police Station,
Nagapattinam District.
5.The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai – 600 104.
+1cc to M/s.M.Vinoth, Advocate in SR no.28433
Crl.R.C.No.598 of 2020
RSV (CO)
RV (11/09/2020)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Durgadevi v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durgadevi v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivakumar, Aged 44 Years, Vs State Rep. by

State by Vs Suresh @ Palanivelu

Manikandan Vs the State Rep by Its

Panneerselvam Vs State Rep.by

P.Kumar @ Rajkumar Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

K.Dhanasekaran Vs State Rep. by