Allowed

M.Subbaiah v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Aug 2020CRL OP(MD)/8139/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of illegally transporting river sand under Section 379 IPC read with the Mines and Minerals Act. The grant was subject to a monetary deposit, provision of security, and specific conditions including reporting to police and not tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon deposit of Rs.20,000 to Welfare Fund and execution of a bond with two sureties; to appear before Magistrate within four weeks.

M.Subbaiah Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.8139 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 06/08/2020

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.8139 of 2020

¶8

M.Subbaiah,

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶10

¶11

State Rep By The Inspector of Police, Krishnanakovil Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No. 679 of 2020.

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sivabalan, Advocate.

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.K. Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-

¶16

For an Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 679 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 379 of I.P.C., r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.679 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was said to have illegally transported one unit of river sand by using Tractor. Hence, a complaint has been registered.

¶20

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/3

¶23

CRL OP(MD). No.8139 of 2020

¶24

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, he would further submit that the petitioner will voluntarily make a non refundable payment of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only)to the credit of the Madras High Court Madurai Bench, Advocate Clerk's Welfare Association, Madurai-625 023 (Indian Bank Saving Account No.496039124, IFSC Code: IDIB000H040) without prejudice to his rights in the criminal case.

¶25

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there are three previous cases pending against the petitioner.

¶26

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the quantum of sand, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶27

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Srivilliputhur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶28

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶29

(b)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only)to the credit of Madras High Court Madurai Bench, Advocate Clerk's Welfare Association, Madurai-625 023 (Indian Bank Saving Account No.496039124, IFSC Code: IDIB000H040), within a period of Two weeks without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court ;

¶30

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶31

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶32

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶33

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action

¶34

2/3

¶35

CRL OP(MD). No.8139 of 2020

¶36

against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶37

(g)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

06/08/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. vsg

¶42

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. TO

¶43

1.The Judicial Magistrte Court No.II, Srivilliputhur. 2. do through, The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Krishnanakovil Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶44

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Copy to The Officer Incharge, Advocate Clerk's Welfare Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶45

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8139 of 2020 Date : 06/08/2020 VB/SKN/SAR-II (12.08.2020) 3P 6C

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶47

3/3

M.Subbaiah v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Subbaiah v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. George Dmitro Vs G. Ananthi

B.Rajendran Vs The Inspector of Police

Thangavel Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M.Kaliraj Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Sudalaiyandi Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Anshul Mishra Vs the District Collector