Allowed

Syed Ibrahim v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Jun 2020CRL OP(MD)/5919/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an FIR involving offences under IPC and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, subject to conditions regarding bond, sureties, and appearance for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond, furnishing sureties, and appearance for interrogation.

Syed Ibrahim Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.5919 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 11/06/2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.5919 of 2020

¶7

Syed Ibrahim,

¶8

Malarkodi @ Aasis Banu, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2

¶9

¶10

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.5 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s S.M.Anantha Murugan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

To enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.5 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶17

2.The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 341, 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.5 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

3.Considering the overall fact and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.5919 of 2020

¶21

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶22

4.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of eight weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

sd/-

¶24

11/06/2020

¶25

/ TRUE COPY /

¶26

/ /2020

¶27

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶29

¶30

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶31

DO-THROUGH :THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶32

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVAKASI TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶33

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶34

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5919 of 2020 Date :11/06/2020 MYR AE/PN/SAR-III (12.06.2020) 2P 5C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

Syed Ibrahim v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Ibrahim v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Elakiya Vs The Sub-Inspector of Police

Solaiappan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Thirumeni Vs The Inspector of Police

Ayyappan Vs The Inspector of Police

Ajithkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Kabilan Vs The Inspector of Police