Petitioners sought quashing of a complaint under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.O.P (MD) No.568 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL.O.P (MD) No.568 of 2020
1.Shino @ Iruthaya Anto Shino
2.Ruban
3.Saleth Mary
... Petitioners
Vs
All Women Police Station,
Tuticorin,
Tuticorin District.
(Crime No.14 of 2018) .. Respondent
2.Kowsalya .. Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the records relating to the C.C.No.323/2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tuticorin and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Sankaranathakumar
For Respondent No.1 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor
For Respondent No.2 : Mr.T.Sathiyanathan
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
CRL.O.P (MD) No.568 of 2020
PJL
To
CRL.O.P (MD) No.568 of 2020 07.02.2020
VB(20.02.2020) 2P 3C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shino @ Iruthaya Anto Shino
Ruban
Saleth Mary
State
Kowsalya
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
