Disposed

P.Kiruba v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC18 Mar 2020CRL OP(MD)/4779/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, in a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for police protection amid domestic disputes, recorded the submission of the fourth respondent assuring safety and restored the matter to the police, effectively closing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed upon the assurance of the fourth respondent to ensure the safety of the petitioner and her husband.

P.Kiruba Vs The Superintendent of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.03.2020 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CRL.O.P.(MD)No.4779 of 2020

¶4

P.Kiruba ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police Madurai District, Madurai 2.The Inspector of Police Town Police Station Thirumangalam Taluk Madurai District 3.The Inspector of Police Taluk Police Station Thirumangalam Madurai District

¶6

4.The Sub Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Thirumangalam Madurai District

¶7

Vasuki ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying, to direct the first and second respondents to give necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her husband including her family members by taking necessary action against the fifth respondent.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Balameenakshi For Respondents : Mrs.S.Bharathi No.1 to 4 Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

This criminal original petition has been filed for a direction to direct the first and second respondents to give necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her husband including her family members by taking necessary action against the fifth respondent.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/2

¶14

¶15

The marriage between the petitioner and one Mohandass was performed on 23.08.2018 and thereafter due to some difference of opinion between the petitioner and her husband, she made a complaint before the fourth respondent. During enquiry before the fourth respondent the petitioner and her husband agreed to resolve the issue between them but the same was not accepted by the fifth respondent/mother of the petitioner. The fifth respondent and her relatives joined together and attacked the petitioner as well as her husband, thereby the petitioner has filed the present petition for police protection.

¶16

Today the fourth respondent/ The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thirumangalam appeared before this Court and submitted that she will ensure the safety of the petitioner and her husband.

¶17

4.Recording the said submission, this criminal original petition is closed.

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

aav

¶22

¶23

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶24

2.The Inspector of Police Town Police Station, Thirumangalam Madruai District.

¶25

3.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Thirumangalam Madurai District.

¶26

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶27

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.4779 of 2020 18.03.2020

¶29

SP: 07.05.2020/2P/6C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

P.Kiruba v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Kiruba v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sathyanarayanan Vs The Inspector of Police

O.Kasimayan Vs M/S.Shriram Transport

Bharathidasan Vs the Inspector of Police

Devadasan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Krishnan @ Duraipandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Ram Mohandoss Gandhi Vs The Additional Deputy Superintendent of Police