Allowed

Abishek v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Dec 2020CRL OP(MD)/14317/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, an accused named Abishek charged with robbery (Section 395 IPC). The Court considered the recovery of stolen money and the duration of incarceration, releasing him on Rs.10,000 bond with stringent reporting and surety conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on execution of a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties subject to strict reporting and conduct conditions including prohibition of absconding and tampering with evidence.

Abishek Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.14317 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 08/12/2020

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.14317 of 2020

¶8

Abishek ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known Vs

¶9

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai City. Crime No. 313/2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Muniyandi, Advocate.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime no. 313 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner/A3, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.11.2020 for the offences punishable under Section 395 of IPC on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner on showing cycle chain had taken away Rs.2100/- from the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint.

¶17

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He would also submit that this the second bail petition and the petitioner is in jail for more than 30 days, hence he may be granted bail.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that there are totally six accused in this case and the petitioner herein https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ is arrayed as A3. This is the second bail petition and the earlier

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.14317 of 2020

¶21

bail petition was dismissed by this Court on 24.11.2020. The petitioner on showing cycle chain the petitioner had taken away Rs.2100/- from the defacto complainant and the same was recovered from the petitioner.

¶22

Taking note of the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration and also taking note of the fact that the property was recovered, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶23

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two blood sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai

¶24

i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity

¶25

ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., 1.30 p.m., and 5.30 pm., until further orders.

¶26

iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness.

¶27

iv) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

¶28

v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶29

vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/-

08/12/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2020

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶35

Madurai - 625 023.

¶36

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ concerned.

¶37

2/3

¶38

CRL OP(MD). No.14317 of 2020

¶39

¶40

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.

¶41

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AVANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION MADURAI CITY. 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶42

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14317 of 2020 Date :08/12/2020

¶43

aav JM/PN/SAR IV/08.12.2020/3P/6C

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶45

3/3

Abishek v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abishek v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ponkaruppasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

R.Kalaiselvi Vs The Inspector of Police

Karupaiah Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Aravindan Vs The Inspector of Police

Karuppasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Muthupandi Vs The Inspector of Police