Allowed

Harikrishnapandian v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Dec 2020CRL OP(MD)/14277/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a second petition since they failed to surrender in the first. They were released on bond with sureties upon arrest and asked to appear before Police.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail on posting bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and complying with appearance conditions.

Harikrishnapandian Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.14277 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 09/12/2020

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.14277 of 2020

¶8

1.Harikrishnapandian

¶9

2.S.P.Surendran

¶10

3.Bala ... Petitioners/Accused

2,3 and 5

1.The State rep.by

The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Madurai City. Crime No.45/2019. ... Respondent/Complainant 2.Jegajeevan ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Kasimayan

¶16

For R1 : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶17

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶18

PRAYER :-

¶19

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 45/2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶20

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶21

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶22

2.The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406, 417, 418, 420, 506(1), 341 and 323 of I.P.C., in Crime No.45 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶23

3.Anticipatory bail was already granted to the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3016 of 2020. But then, the petitioners did not surrender within time. Therefore, filing of this second petition is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ necessary.

¶24

1/2

¶25

CRL OP(MD). No.14277 of 2020

¶26

4.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai District, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶27

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶28

/ TRUE COPY /

¶29

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI.

¶33

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶34

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶35

CITY CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI CITY.

¶36

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶37

CRL OP(MD) No.14277 of 2020 RMI Date :09/12/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TK/VR/SAR.2/15.12.2020/2P/5C

¶38

2/2

Harikrishnapandian v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harikrishnapandian v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vava Bhuhardeen Vs Jai Sankar

Chandralekha Vs The Inspector of Police

V.Ganesan Vs S.Ramanathan

M.Sharmila Vs the Director

Dr. P. Maragatham, W/o.K.Manickam Vs The Superintendent of police

M.Noordheen Vs the Deputy Superintendent of