Allowed

Sakthivel (Yelam Arivu) v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Nov 2020CRL OP(MD)/12248/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an accused in a case involving extortion and robbery, subject to conditions including execution of a bond, daily reporting to police, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond, daily police reporting for four weeks, and other standard conditions.

Sakthivel (Yelam Arivu) Vs The Sub Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.12248 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 03/11/2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.12248 of 2020

¶7

Sakthivel (Yelam Arivu) ... Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶8

State rep.by its., The Sub Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Trichy District.

¶9

Crime No. 1578 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Thangapandian, Advocate. For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anandha Devi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶12

PRAYER :-

¶13

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1578 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police

¶14

ORDER :The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner, who is arrayed as A3, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 395 & 397 of IPC, in Crime No.1578 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons made threat against the defacto complainant by showing a knife and snatched a sum of Rs.4,500/- from him. Hence, the complaint.

¶17

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.12248 of 2020

¶21

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that there are totally 5 accused. The petitioner along with other accused persons made threat against the defacto complainant by showing a knife and snatched a sum of Rs.4,500/- from him. He further submitted that the petitioner is having one previous case.

¶23

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there is no specific allegations against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶24

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Musiri, Trichy District,on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two blood relative sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶25

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix his photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of his Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure his identity;

¶26

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m without fail for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

¶27

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶28

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶29

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5560]; and;

¶30

2/3

¶31

CRL OP(MD). No.12248 of 2020

¶32

(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶33

sd/03/11/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶34

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶35

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2.DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSIRI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.R.THANGAPANDIAN Advocate SR.No.7259 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12248 of 2020 Date :03/11/2020 DSS PK/AKM/SAR-II/05.11.2020 : 3P/6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

3/3

Sakthivel (Yelam Arivu) v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakthivel (Yelam Arivu) v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rajalingam Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Sheik Mohamed Ismail Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

M.Easwaran Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Subburaj Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijayakanth Vs the Inspector of Police

Balamurugan Vs the Inspector of Police