Disposed

A.Jasmine v. The Superintendent of police

Madras HC5 Oct 2020CRL OP(MD)/10806/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought protection from harassment by the police based on complaints by other respondents. The court recorded an undertaking from the Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner would not be summoned or harassed. The petition was disposed of based on this undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted undertaking by Additional Public Prosecutor that she will not be summoned or harassed; petition disposed of.

A.Jasmine Vs The Superintendent of police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10806 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2020 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10806 of 2020

A.Jasmine

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶8

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadacheri Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

¶9

3.Laila

¶10

4.Mahin ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2^nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioner in the name of the enquiry based on the false complaint given by the 3^rd respondent.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Maran For Respondents : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2.

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first and second respondents.

¶15

2.The petitioner was married to one Shaji. Since the petitioner faced domestic violence at his hands, the petitioner is said to have moved from Nagercoil to Tiruppur. The petitioner states that she is being harassed by the second respondent at the instance of the complaints from the third and fourth respondents

¶16

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Additional Public Prosecutor states that the petitioner will not be

¶17

1/2

¶18

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10806 of 2020

¶19

summoned for enquiry or harassed in any manner.

¶20

4.Recording the said undertaking, the criminal original petition is disposed of.

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS I)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

ias

¶25

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

To:

¶27

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶28

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadacheri Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

¶29

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 10806 of 2020 05.10.2020

¶30

SR(CO) KK(15.10.2020) 2P 4C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

A.Jasmine v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Jasmine v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganapathi Narayanasamy Vs the Commissioner

K.Anitha , Vs the Commissioner

Muthulakshmi Vs the Assistnat Commissioner

Karuppaiah, Vs Kannan

Baskar Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Rajendran Vs Mathiyalagan