Dismissed

S.Suresh v. Minor S.Megna

Madras HC28 Feb 2020CRL OP(MD)/1054/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407(1) Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of a maintenance trial from the Magistrate, Thuraiyur, to Karur, directing the trial court to complete the trial within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete the trial in six weeks and dispose of the case; any future maintenance recovery petition by the husband to be disposed without delay.

S.Suresh Vs Minor S.Megna — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1054 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.02.2020 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶4

Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 1054 of 2020 and Crl.M.P. (MD) No.450 of 2020

¶5

S.Suresh

¶6

...Petitioner/Respondent

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.Minor.S.Megkna

¶9

2.G.Srilakshmi ... Respondents/Petitioners

¶10

PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 407(1) of Criminal Procedure Code, to transfer the M.C.No.2 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, to Judicial Magistrate, Karur.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.P.Malini For Respondents : Mrs.Prabhashini for Mr.R.Ravindran

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to transfer the M.C.No.2 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, to Judicial Magistrate, Karur.

¶14

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that whenever the petitioner had attended the trial Court at Tiruchirappalli, the respondent / wife is in habit of creating problems and quarrelled with the petitioner / husband. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking for transfer of the case.

¶15

3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that since the petitioner has not paid the arrears of maintenance amount, it was questioned by the respondent/wife other than that the first respondent has not quarrelled with the petitioner.

¶16

4.At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays a direction may be issued to the trial Court to complete the trial and dispose the same as early as possible.

¶17

5.considering the aforesaid submission, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed with a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, to complete the trial in M.C.No.2 of 2017 and to dispose the same in accordance with law as expeditiously https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1054 of 2020

¶20

as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that in the event of any petition being filed to recover the arrears of maintenance, it shall be considered and disposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur without any delay. Consequently, the connected criminal miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (AD II)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

vsg

¶26

¶27

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur. 2.The Judicial Magistrate, Karur.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.R.RAVINDRAN, Advocate ( SR-9747[F] dated 03/03/2020 )

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.P.MALINI, Advocate ( SR-9779[F] dated 03/03/2020 )

¶30

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1054 of 2020 28.02.2020

¶31

KK(12.06.2020) 2P 5C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

S.Suresh v. Minor S.Megna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Suresh v. Minor S.Megna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jenifer William Vs the Regional Passport Officer

Nesa Raj Abiraham Vs The Inspector of Police

Revathi Sambasivam Vs The Inspector of Police

P. Julies Ravichandran Vs The Inspector of Police

Ramasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

M.P.Raja Vs The Inspector of Police