Allowed

Ashkar Ali v. State Rep by

Madras HC1 Jul 2020CRL OP/9842/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case concerning illegal transportation of river sand, subject to the payment of a non-refundable deposit to the Advocates Clerks Welfare Association, execution of a bond with sureties, daily reporting, and specific behavioral conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs.10,000, execution of bond with sureties, and compliance with reporting and conduct conditions.

Ashkar Ali Vs State Rep by — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.07.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.9842 of 2020

Ashkar Ali

...Petitioner

Vs.

State represented by ...Respondent The Sub-Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.1721 of 2020

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.1721 of 2020, pending investigation on the file of respondent police.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.B.S.Manikandan

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 430 IPC read with Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals Act, and section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.1721 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner is alleged to have transported quarter unit of river sand illegally. Hence the complaint.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶17

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of sand involved is quarter unit. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

¶18

This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Madras High Court

¶19

Advocates Clerks Welfare Associations (Indian Bank SBNo.484077244, IFSC No.IDIB000M157) without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶20

6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of Madras High Court Advocates Clerks Welfare Associations (Indian Bank SBNo.484077244, IFSC No.IDIB000M157) within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Thiruvannamalai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶21

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶22

[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Madras High Court Advocates Clerks Welfare Associations (Indian Bank SBNo.484077244, IFSC No.IDIB000M157) and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

¶23

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶24

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶25

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶26

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶29

-sd/-

¶30

01/07/2020

¶31

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶32

TRUE COPY

¶33

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶34

¶35

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLUR, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION].

¶36

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶37

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

¶38

5 MADRAS HIGH COURT ADVOCATES CLERKS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONS (INDIAN BANK SBNO.484077244,IFSC NO.IDIB000M157)

¶39

CC to M/S B.S.MANIKANDAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶40

CRL OP.9842/2020

¶41

Date :01/07/2020 MN-MK-31/07/2020

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ashkar Ali v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashkar Ali v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.S.Karthikeyan Vs State Represented by

Sumathi Vs the State Rep by Its

Selvam Suntharamoorthy Vs State Rep. by

Udhayakumar Vs State Rep. by Its

Mariappan Vs the State through

Rajkumar Vs the State Rep by Its