Deepa v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed two criminal original petitions for anticipatory bail filed by a husband and wife (A3 & A4) accused of possession of ganja under the NDPS Act, citing active participation and a prior criminal record.
What did the court decide?
Petitions for anticipatory bail dismissed; no bail granted.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.Nos.9043 &9079 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24 .06.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.Nos.9043 &9079 of 2020
Deepa (aged 21)
W/o Seethupathy
No.1/160,Manthai Veli Street,
Tajpura Post,Vellore District ... Petitioner in
Crl.O.P.No.9043 of 2020
Seethupathy @ Sethupathi (aged 30)
S/o Govindan
No.69,Samuthiruam Colony,
Thiruvannamalai District, ... Petitioner in
Crl.O.P.No.9079 of 2020
Vs.
State Represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station,
Thiruvannamalai District.
Cr. No.99 of 2020 .. Respondent in
both Crl.O.Ps
Common Prayer : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners in the event of their arrest by granting anticipatory bail in Crime No.99 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
http://www.judis.nic.in Page 1 of 6
Crl.O.P.Nos.9043 &9079 of 2020
For Petitioner in both Crl.O.Ps : Mr. M.Manivelan For Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners charged under NDPS Act.
Whether previous criminal record of petitioner disinclines the court to grant bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepa
- petitioner
Seethupathy
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court