Allowed

Varadharajan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 May 2020CRL OP/7457/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody for posting false messages on WhatsApp accused of inciting communal hatred. The Court imposed strict conditions, including an ex-gratia bond and provisions for registration of a fresh FIR under Section 229A IPC in case of absconding.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail to the petitioner subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, reporting as required, and undertaking not to tamper with evidence or abscond.

Varadharajan Vs the Inspector of Police — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :07.05.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7457 of 2020

¶6

Varadharajan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. The State rep.by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal Town and District.

¶8

Crime No.361 of 2020.

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.361 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.Sundaravadhanan

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.04.2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 153A and 295A IPC in Crime No.361 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner had forwarded a false message in whatsapp stating that, the defacto complainant was running a Shobika Cloth Centre, he along with three persons were affected with Corona Virus and they have been arrested by the police and taken to hospital for giving treatment. Out of the four persons, two persons were died, which had resulted in spreading communal hatred message against Muslims. Hence, the complaint.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence as alleged by the prosecution. It is a false case and it has been falsely implicated, the earlier bail petitions in Crl.M.P.Nos.415 of 2020 and 440 of 2020 were dismissed on the file of the Principal District Court, Namakkal, dated 17.04.2020 and 24.04.2020 respectively. Further he would submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 11.04.2020 and hence, he seeks bail for the petitioner.

¶18

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner send a whatsapp message and forward the same to the entire society with false information about Covid-19. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Taking into consideration the nature of allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and also the petitioner is in judicial custody from 11.04.2020, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions :

¶20

[a] the petitioner shall execute his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) before the Superintendent of the concerned prison;

¶21

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶22

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶23

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶24

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶25

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶26

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶27

-sd/-

¶28

07/05/2020

¶29

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶30

TRUE COPY

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶32

TO
1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSION JUDGE,
NAMAKKAL.
2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I
NAMAKKAL.
3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
NAMAKKAL. [FOR INFORMATION]
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
NAMAKKAL POLICE STATION,
NAMAKKAL TOWN AND DISTRICT.
6 THE OFFICER INCHARGE
SUB JAIL, NAMAKKAL.
CC to M/S.A.SUNDARAVADHANAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.7457/2020
Date :07/05/2020
TA-17/07/2020

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Varadharajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Varadharajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palani Vs the Inspector of Police

Deenadayalan Vs State Rep by Its the Inspector of Police Gomangalam Police Station

Thajudheen @ Abdul Ajis Vs the Inspector of Police

A Mumtaz Hussain Vs the Intelligence Officer

Sreenivasan Vs the Inspector of Police, Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal

1. Senthamilselvan @ Selvam Vs Station House Officer,Annamalai Nagar Police Station