Disposed

G.Kuralarasan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC13 Jan 2020CRL OP/628/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC by an inter-caste couple seeking police protection at their matrimonial home, the High Court of Madras directed the second respondent to consider the pending representation and dispose of it within a week. Based on Lata Singh and the right to marry freely, the court disposed of the petition with directions to the police.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 18.07.2019, afford them an opportunity to put forth their case, and dispose of the matter within a week from receipt of

G.Kuralarasan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 13.01.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.628 of 2020

¶6

G.Kuralarasan

¶7

C.Thenmozhi ... Petitioners Vs.

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Kachirapalayam Police Station, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District. ...Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioners to live in their matrimonial home at No.A/A, Nadu Theru, Eduthavainatham Village and post, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ramesh

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioners to live in their matrimonial home.

¶15

The petitioners are husband and wife. They have married under the Special Marriage Act on 15.07.2019 in the presence of elders and relatives in the locality.

¶16

The parents of the second petitioner and their relatives are now causing threat to the petitioners and they are bent upon breaking the marriage.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The petitioners have given a representation on 18.07.2019 to the respondents seeking for police protection apprehending danger to their life. Since, no action has been taken on the representation made by the petitioners, the present petition has been filed before this court seeking for police protection.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioners relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lata Singh Vs.State of U.P and another reported in (2006) 5 SCC 475, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has made it clear that no one can be subjected to any threat, harassment or violence, in the case of inter-caste marriage and it is a freedom of adults to marry a person of once own choice out side one's cases. The said judgment squarely applies to the facts of the present case. No one has a right to interfere with the life of the petitioners and the parents of the second petitioner does not have a right to cause threat to the petitioners.

¶20

The petitioners have already submitted a

¶21

representation to the respondent police. The second respondent is directed to consider the petitioners' representation dated 18.07.2019 after giving an opportunity to the petitioners to put forth their case and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the aforesaid directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶25

//True copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

¶29

The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.

¶30

The Inspector of Police,

¶31

Kachirapalayam Police Station,

¶32

Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

¶33

CRL.O.P.No.628 of 2020

¶34

VSN II(CO) GMY(11/02/2020)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Kuralarasan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Kuralarasan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Murugan Vs the State Rep by

R.Moorthy Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Thangaraj Vs State Rep by

K.Karthik Vs the Inspector of Police

Mani Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohamed Siddique Vs State Represented by