Disposed

Krishna Prasad v. a.Vanitha Prasad

Madras HC21 Jan 2020CRL OP/29390/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a complaint. It directed the trial court to expedite proceedings, dispensed with the petitioner's appearance except for receiving documents under Section 207 Cr.P.C., framing charges, and Section 313 Cr.P.C. examination.

What did the court decide?

Directed to expedite trial; appearance of petitioner dispensed with except for receiving copies under Section 207 Cr.P.C., charges under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

Krishna Prasad Vs a.Vanitha Prasad — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.01.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.29390 of 2013 and Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2013

Krishna Prasad

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.A.Vanitha Prasad 2.The Protection Officer, Domestic Violence Act, District Social Welfare Office, District Collector's Office Complex, Singaravelar Malaigai 8^th floor, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 1. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the complaint in C.C.No.3478 of 2013 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Neethe Perumal For R1 : No Appearance ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.3478 of 2013, pending on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai.

¶13

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial and complete the same as early as possible. He would further submit that the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court may be dispensed with and would further submit that the petitioner is ready to appear as and when necessary arise.

¶14

3.In view of the above, this Court directs the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore to expedite the trial in C.C.No.3478 of 2013 and complete the same as early as possible. The appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court is dispensed with. However, this order will not stand on the way

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

of the Trial Court to insist for the appearance of the petitioner for receiving copies under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and judgment and as and when the Trial Court feels it necessary.

¶17

4.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶20

// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vv2
To
1. The X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Egmore, Chennai
2. The Protection Officer,
Domestic Violence Act,
District Social Welfare Office,
District Collector's Office Complex,
Singaravelar Malaigai, 8 th floor,
Rajaji Salai, Chennai-1.
+1cc to Mr.R.Neethi Perumal, Advocate, SR.No.3828.
Crl.O.P.No.29390 of 2013
EV(CO)
CSR: 20.02.2020

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Krishna Prasad v. a.Vanitha Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Prasad v. a.Vanitha Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravia Aejaz Vs Rajesh Singhi

S.Elizabeth Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Fr.M.Devadoss S.J. Vs Sr.Florance Mary

V.Vijayakumar Vs the Inspecto Rof Police

P.K.Janeesh Vs M/S.Balaji Finance

Anbarasan Vs State Rep.by