Aiyub v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner charged with running an illegal lottery under the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act and IPC 420. Bail was conditional upon payment of Rs. 1 lakh for school toilet construction and strict reporting.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail with conditions including payment of Rs.1 lakh for toilet construction, execution of bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police, and prohibition on tampering with ev
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twelfth day of February Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2834 of 2020
AIYUB [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.77/2020)
For Petitioner : M/S. R.SASIKUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.C.IYYAPPARAJ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging offence under the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act and IPC Section 420.
Whether conditions precedent for the grant of anticipatory bail, including performance of a charitable act, should be imposed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AIYUB
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT
Coram
M. DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court