A.Rashid v. the State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. after noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail in a similar case involving alleged cheque fraud and forgery.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner ordered to be released on bail by executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with sureties, reporting daily for two weeks, and complying with standard bail conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Seventh day of February Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2592 of 2020
A.RASHID [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAVALLI POLICE STATION, VADAVALLI, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT. CR.NO.344 OF 2019.
For Petitioner : M/S.K.BALASUBRAMANIAM Advocate
For Respondent : MR.C.IYYAPPARAJ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail in view of the similar facts and circumstances where his co-accutant had already been granted anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.RASHID
- respondent
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court