Disposed

Alamelu Ammal v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Dec 2020CRL OP/20403/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a CPI filed for police protection under Section 482 CrPC, the Madras High Court held the petitioner entitled to submit a fresh representation with a new cause of action, directing the police to conduct an enquiry upon receipt.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner at liberty to file fresh representation with new cause of action; respondent police directed to conduct enquiry if received.

Alamelu Ammal Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:23.12.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.20403 of 2020

¶6

K.Alamelu Ammal

¶7

¶8

Inspector of Police, J7, Velacherry Police Station, Chennai – 600 042.

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent police herein to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner Ms.Alamelu Ammal, and her workmen and agents being in possession of the lands in New T.S.No.14, Old Survey No.164, Door No.6, Block No.039, Ward No.001 at Velachery Town (Part 2), Velachery Taluk, Chennai Corporation, Chennai District, on the strength of complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 25.02.2020 which is on the file of the respondent Police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Veena For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R (through Video Conference)

¶11

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction, to direct the respondent police herein to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner Ms.Alamelu Ammal, and her workmen and agents being in possession of the lands in New T.S.No.14, Old Survey No.164, Door No.6, Block No.039, Ward No.001 at Velachery Town (Part 2), Velachery Taluk, Chennai Corporation, Chennai District, on the strength of complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 25.02.2020.

¶12

2.Heard Ms.P.Veena, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.S.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶13

3.Today, when the petition is came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that in respect of the

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

representation dated 25.02.2020 which have been given by the petitioner, the respondent police conducted enquiry in C.S.R.No.47 of 2020 and the same has been closed for the reason that the dispute having by the petitioner is civil in nature. According to him, as of now, no representation is pending on the file of the respondent police. The said submission is recorded.

¶16

4.In this regard, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would contend that though various Courts have passed orders in favour of the petitioner, now the adjacent owners of the petitioner are causing much disturbance to the possession of the petitioner.

¶17

5.Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is at liberty to give fresh representation with new cause of action to the respondent police. If such representation is received from the petitioner, the respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry in accordance with law.

¶18

6.With these observations, this Criminal Original Petition
is disposed of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
ay Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
J7, Velacherry Police Station,
Chennai – 600 042.
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai.
+1cc to M/s.P.Veena Suresh, Advocate, S.R.No.42863
Crl.O.P.No.20403 of 2020
(CO)
rv(22/01/2021)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Alamelu Ammal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alamelu Ammal v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumaravel, Vs State Rep. by

Velusamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan Vs the Inspector of Police

Durai Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Balu Vs Govindaraj

Udaya Vs the State Rep by