Praveen v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 506(2) IPC. Bail is subject to depositing money with the Legal Services Authority and strict reporting conditions.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail subject to specific conditions including reporting to police daily for two weeks and depositing money with Legal Services Authority.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 18.11.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRL.O.P.No.17644 of 2020
Praveen
Vs.
State represented by The Inspector of Police, R-4, Soundara Pandian Police Station, Chennai-17 (Crime No.119 of 2018) ... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner/Accused Person on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No.119 of 2018 on the file of the R-4, Soundara Pandian Police Station.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palani
For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R (The cases have been heard through video conference)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite previous non-surrender and lack of furnished sureties?
What conditions should be imposed to grant anticipatory bail in the circumstances of the case?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Praveen
- respondent
State represented by The Inspector of Police
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court