Disposed

M.Kamal v. State Rep.by

Madras HC5 Nov 2020CRL OP/17396/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court directed the police to issue a notice under Section 41(A) Cr.P.C. for the petitioner to appear and complete the enquiry by 02.12.2020. The petitioner was informed that he could file for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. if arrest grounds were stated. The Criminal Original Petition was subsequently closed.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent police to issue notice under Section 41(A) Cr.P.C.; petitioner directed to appear; enquiry to be completed by 02.12.2020; petitioner permitted to file anticipatory bail application

M.Kamal Vs State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 05.11.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.17396 of 2020

¶6

M. Kamal ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, Veerapandi Police Station, Tiruppur District. ( Cr.No. Not known of 2020) ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. not known pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M. Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in C.S.R.No.558 of 2020 on the complaint of one Prabhakaran.

¶13

The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C., to the petitioners. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 02.12.2020. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioners, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioner and in that case, the petitioner is at liberty to file necessary application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶16

-sd/05/11/2020

¶17

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶18

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV,
TIRUPPUR.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE,
VEERAPANDI POLICE STATION,
TIRUPPUR.
CC to M/S.J.FRANKLIN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.17396/2020
Date :05/11/2020
MK:20/11/2020

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Kamal v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Kamal v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs the State Rep by

P.Muthulingam Vs the State Rep by

Santhosh Vs State Rep.by

B.Vasanthakumar Vs State by the Inspector of Police

Govindhsamy Vs State Rep by Its

P.Sathish Kumar Vs State Rep by