Jeeva v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The counsel requested and was permitted to withdraw the petition, which is accordingly allowed.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the petition permitted and the petition allowed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.11.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.16605 of 2020
Jeeva ... Petitioner
State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai CBCID Police Station, Tiruvannamalai.
(Crime No.02 of 2020). ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.02 of 2020 on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jawahar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor *** O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jeeva
- respondent
State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai CBCID Police Station
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court