The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 13.10.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.16198 of 2020
Gopinath ... Petitioner
– Vs -
State rep. By ... Respondent
The Inspector of Police,
CSCID Police Station,
Salem District.
(Crime No.98 of 2020).
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.98 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER (The case has been heard through video conference)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CSCID POLICE STATION, SALEM.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.16198/2020
Date :13/10/2020
TA-23/10/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopinath
State
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
