Allowed

M.Lavanya v. State Rep by

Madras HC3 Feb 2020CRL OP/1481/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving illegal transport of building material under Sections 379 IPC and 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act. The bail was subject to a non-refundable deposit, surety bond, daily reporting, and restrictions on tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs.25,000 as non-refundable amount, execution of bond with sureties, daily reporting for two weeks, and undertakings against tampering and absconding.

M.Lavanya Vs State Rep by — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 03.02.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020 R. Senthilkumar S/o Rajamanickam ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Samalpatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No.4 of 2021) ... Respondent

¶7

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 4 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R

¶9

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶10

The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.4 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶11

1/6

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶13

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶14

It is the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along

¶15

with some other person were illegally transporting 5 units of M-sand in his vehicle. Hence, the complaint.

¶16

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. On instruction, he would further submit that the petitioner is prepared to deposit some considerable amount to any charitable organization or association without prejudice to his contention and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶17

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

¶18

respondent submitted that the quantity of M sand involved is 5 units. He further submitted that there is no previous cases pending against the petitioner.

¶19

5. It is seen that there are no previous cases pending against the

¶20

petitioner and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court

¶21

is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶25

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five Thousand Only) as non refundable deposit

¶26

to '' The Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Indian Bank High Court Branch', A/C.No.484026006, IFSC Code. No. IDIB000M157 without

¶27

prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

¶28

6. Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount,

¶29

it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the

¶30

trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶31

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶32

(a) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of ' ' The Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Indian Bank High Court Branch', A/C.No.484026006, IFSC Code. No. IDIB000M157, within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or his appearance and on production of proof of deposit of the above amount and on further condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed automatically and on further condition that the petitioner shall also give an letter of

¶33

3/6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶35

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶36

undertaking before the respondent/police that the said amount has been paid in respect of particular crime number.

¶37

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶38

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.

¶39

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶40

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶41

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶42

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶43

8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is

ordered.

03.02.2021

smn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶48

4/6

¶49

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶50

¶51

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Uthukangarai

¶52

2.The Inspector of Police, Samalpatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

¶53

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

¶54

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶55

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2020

¶56

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.

¶57

smn

¶58

Crl.O.P.No.1481 of 2021

¶59

03.02.2021

¶60

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

M.Lavanya v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Lavanya v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Dakshinamoorthy, Vs The Commissioner

Amul Vs State Rep. by

T.T.Srinivasan Vs The Tahsildhar

Mrs.Amutha Subramanian Vs the Managing Director

Mano Bichemane Vs The Deputy Secretary to Government

Ppmt Club, Tirupur, Vs The Superintendent of Police