Nagaraj v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of criminal trespass, public nuisance, mischief, andcriminal intimidation arising from a property dispute. Bail was subject to conditions including reporting to police and execution of surety bonds.
What did the court decide?
Granted bail in the event of arrest on condition of reporting to police, executing bond with sureties, and refraining from tampering with evidence or absconding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.14435 of 2020
1.Nagaraj
2.Murali ... Petitioners
Vs.
State The Sub Inspector of Police Berigai Police Station, Berigai, Krishnagiri District (Crime No.341 of 2020) ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest of petitioners in Crime No.341 of 2020 on the file of the Berigai Police Station, Berigai, Krishnagiri District.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Selvarangan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 294(b), 427, 506(2) IPC, in Crime No.341 of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners charged with offences under Sections 447, 294(b), 427, and 506(2) IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nagaraj others
- respondent
State others
Coram
Justice E.A.D. Jagadish Chandra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court