Petitioners sought to quash a criminal complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Counsel requested withdrawal of the petition, which the Court allowed, dismissing the petition as withdrawn and closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No. 14159 of 2014 and MP.No. 1 of 2014
1.Seetha @ Seethalakshmi
2.Karthick ...Petitioners/ Accused 1 and 2
Vs.
1. State rep by
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Erode
(Cr.No.49 of 2013) ...Respondent/complainant
2.Pachiammal ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records in Cr.No.49 of 2013 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Erode(respondent police) and quash the same as against the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Sentihilkumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, APP for R1 : Mr.S.Jayakumar for R2 ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect .
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Seetha @ Seethalakshmi
Karthick
State
Pachiammal
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
