Allowed

Vikram v. State Rep by

Madras HC11 Sept 2020CRL OP/13721/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating case. The High Court approved the extension of bail on strict conditions including daily reporting, surrendering biometric details, and refraining from tampering with evidence or absconding.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed and petitioner ordered to release on bail subject to strict conditions including reporting every day at 10.30 a.m.

Vikram Vs State Rep by — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 11.09.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.13721 of 2020

¶6

Vikram

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State Rep by its The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai – 606 604. ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.2499 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : MrArun Saravanan

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶12

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 420 and 511 of IPC, in Crime No.2499 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the petitioner had made advertisement in his facebook page that he would get E-pass within one hour and attempted to cheat the public.Hence, the complaint.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would submit that the petitioner is a social worker and due to the pandemic situation, the petitioner got E-pass for the persons, who are not able to get the same. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had made advertisement in his facebook page that he would get E-pass within one hour and attempted to cheat the

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

public. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate–II, Tiruvannamalai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶20

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶21

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶22

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶23

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶24

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶25

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶28

-sd/11/09/2020

¶29

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶30

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II,
THIRUVANNAMALAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
THIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
THIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANNAMALAI-606 604.
CC to M/S.ARUN SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.13721/2020
Date :11/09/2020
GKS:22/09/2020

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vikram v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santhi Vs State Rep.by

S.Chinnaponnu Vs State Rep by

S.Shivakumar Vs the State Rep by

Mohan Raj Vs State Represented by

A.Palanisamy Vs State Rep.by

D.Kumar Vs State Rep by