Allowed

K.Ravi v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC23 Jan 2020CRL OP/1313/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a criminal original petition seeking action by the Inspector of Police regarding a complaint of financial fraud. The High Court directed the third respondent to expedite the preliminary enquiry within four weeks and register the case if any cognizable offence is found.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent is directed to expedite the preliminary enquiry, and if a cognizable offence is found, to register the case and proceed within four weeks.

K.Ravi Vs the Commissioner of Police — Madras HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.01.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.1313 of 2020

¶6

K.R.Ravi ...Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

1.The Commissioner of Police Police Commissionerate Office Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶9

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police Police Commissionerate Office, Central Crime Branch Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶10

3.The Inspector of Police Police Commissionerate Office Central Crime Branch, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the third respondent to take further action on the petitioner's complaint's dated 21.11.2019.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kalyan Kishen Singh

¶13

For Respondents : M.Mohamed Riyaz

¶14

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed by the defacto complainant to direct the third respondent to take further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 21.11.2019.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that based on the phone calls received from a person that on payment of Rs.6,87,500/-, the petitioner will get back Rs.3,94,32,525/-,

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.6,87,500/- but subsequently, the said person has demanded more than the said sum and hence, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the third respondent on 21.11.2019 but sofar no action has been taken on the said complaint.

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that after receipt of the petitioner's complaint, preliminary enquiry has been commenced and materials have to be collected from the ICICi Bank and also Reserve Bank of India and hence, he requested to grant some more time for completing the enquiry.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid submissions, the third respondent is directed to expedite the preliminary enquiry and if the enquiry reveals any cognizable offence, he has to register the case and proceed in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

With the above directions, this Criminal Original
Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VIII)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
dna
To
1.The Commissioner of Police
Police Commissionerate Office
Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police
Police Commissionerate Office,
Central Crime Branch
Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
2/4

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

3.The Inspector of Police

¶26

Police Commissionerate Office Central Crime Branch, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶27

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶28

+2 ccs to Mr.R.Kalyan kishen Singh Advocate sr4844

¶29

Crl.O.P.No.1313 of 2020

¶30

aa27/02/2020

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Ravi v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ravi v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Jeganathan Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.G.Munisami Gounder Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.Velraj Vs State Rep. by

Vijay Vs State Rep by

M/S.Nandhi Group Auto Finance Vs the State Rep.by

Ramachandran Vs Elumalai (Deceased)