Allowed

Senthamizhselvi v. State Rep. by

Madras HC7 Aug 2020CRL OP/11608/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of illegal sand mining, subject to the condition of donating Rs.75,000 to a Public Relief Fund and adhering to strict reporting and bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to payment of Rs.75,000 to the Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, execution of bond, daily reporting, and non-tampering conditions.

Senthamizhselvi Vs State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.08.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.11608 of 2020

¶6

Senthamizhselvi ... Petitioner/2^nd Accused

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State represented by,

¶9

The Inspector of Police

¶10

Perugavazhanthan Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

¶11

Crime No. 624 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in Crime No. 624 of 2020, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Perugavazhanthan Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Swami Subramanian
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 of IPC read with Section 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No. 624 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

2 It is the case of the prosecution that on 18.06.2020 at about 05.00 a.m.,,the defacto complainant SI of Police attached to the respondent police,on secret information,found that the first accused in this case illegally loaded river sand from the river bed by using lorry without any valid licence. At that time, on seeing the police, the first accused escaped form

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the scene of occurrence and thereafter the vehicle was seized

¶19

and a complainant has been registered by the respondent police. After enquiry they found that the petitioner herein is the owner of the Lorry.

¶20

3 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is the owner of the Lorry. On instruction, he would further submit that taking into consideration the present Covid pandemic situation the petitioner is prepared to donate/pay some considerable amount to any charitable organization or association without prejudice to his defence and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶21

4 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of five units of sand. He further submitted that there is no previous pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

5 In order to curb the illegal sand mining activities and taking into consideration the voluntary submission made by the petitioner offering to donate/pay considerable amount to any charitable organization or association, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may be directed to donate/pay a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) to Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai SB.A/c. No.117201000000070, IFSC Code.No.IOBA0001172, without prejudice to her rights and contentions before the trial Court.

¶23

6 Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of her guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶24

7 Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶25

(a) The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.75,000/(Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai SB.A/c. No.117201000000070, IFSC Code. No.IOBA0001172, within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or her appearance and on production of proof of payment of the above amount and on further condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the

¶26

petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed automatically and on further condition that the petitioner shall also give a letter of undertaking before the respondent/police that the said amount has been paid in respect of particular organization.

¶27

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶28

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.

¶29

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶30

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶31

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶32

8 With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶33

9 For reporting compliance, post on 28.08.2020.

¶34

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶35

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

¶38

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MANNARGUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVARUR DISTRICT [FOR INFORMATION]

¶39

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT,MADRAS. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUGAVAZHANTHAN POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT

¶40

5 THE CHIEF MINISTER'S PUBLIC RELIEF FUND, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, SECRETARIAT BRANCH, CHENNAI,SB.A/C.NO.117201000000070; IFSC CODE.IOBA0001172

¶41

CC to M/S. SWAMI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶42

CRL OP.11608/2020 Date :07/08/2020 GKS:24/08/2020

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Senthamizhselvi v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthamizhselvi v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.R.Murugaswamy Vs State by

Ayyanar Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Krishnamurthy Vs the State

Ramarajan Vs State by

Karthikeyan Vs the State Rep.by

Praveen Kumar Vs State by