Disposed

G.Sivaprakasam v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC5 Aug 2020CRL OP/11571/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought police protection to fence agricultural land and lay pipelines. The court directed the police (second respondent) to conduct an enquiry on the complaint and issue notices, directing the petitioner to produce relevant civil judgments.

What did the court decide?

Directed second respondent to conduct enquiry; petitioner to issue notice to third respondent and produce civil judgments; orders to be passed within four weeks.

G.Sivaprakasam Vs the Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.08.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.11571 of 2020

¶6

G.Sivaprakasam
S/o. Gurusamygounder
Aumaikarar Thottam,
Door No.37, Puliampatti,
Maathur Post,
Anthiyur Taluk,
Erode District. ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District, Erode.
2. The Sub Inspector of Police,
Vellithirupur Police Station,
Vellithirupur, Erode District.
3. Balasubramaniam,
S/o. Sembannagounder,
Puliampatti,
Maathur Village,
Bhavani Taluk,
Erode District. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to give police protection to the petitioner to fence his agricultural land in Survey No.341/5, 341/6, 350/4, 350/6, 350/9 and 350/10 in Amampettai Town, mathur Village, Erode District and to lay the pipe line in the above said agricultural land in view of the petitioner's complaint dated 29.06.2020.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1&R2.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to give police protection to the petitioner to fence his agricultural land in Survey No.341/5,

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

341/6, 350/4, 350/6, 350/9 and 350/10 in Amampettai Town, Mathur Village, Erode District and to lay the pipe line in the above said agricultural land in view of the petitioner's complaint dated 29.06.2020.

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on receipt of the said complaint the second respondent treated the complaint in C.No.G3/SB-016340-1222-2020 and the enquiry is pending.

¶14

Considering the above submission, the second respondent is directed to conduct the enquiry based on the complaint given by the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to issue notice to the third respondent, after issuance of notice, the second respondent pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

The petitioner is directed to produce all the civil
Court judgments on the enquiry before the second respondent.
In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed
of.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District, Erode.
2. The Sub Inspector of Police,
Vellithirupur Police Station,
Vellithirupur, Erode District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.M.Guruprasad, Advocate in Sr No.26089
Crl.O.P.No. 11571 of 2020
SKS(SO)
RV(01.09.2020)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Sivaprakasam v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Sivaprakasam v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K.Bhupathi Yadav Vs the Commissioner of Police

Meena Vs State Rep by Its

Mugunthan Vs Kiruthiga

S.Srividya Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

E.a.Ismail @ Mohammed Ismail Vs State Rep. by

Musthak Basha Vs State Rep by