S.Senguttuvan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail petition (Crl.O.P. No.11513 of 2020) filed under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 24.08.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.11513 of 2020
S.Senguttuvan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Attur Police Station, Salem.
(Crime No.4 of 2020) ... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest in Crime No.4 of 2020, pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
- In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Senguttuvan
- respondent
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Attur Police Station, Salem
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court