Allowed

Babu v. State by Its

Madras HC3 Jul 2020CRL OP/10025/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged illegal transportation of river sand. The court imposed conditions including a refundable deposit to a welfare association, execution of a bond with sureties, daily reporting, and restrictions on tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Order for anticipatory bail granted conditioned upon deposit of Rs.10,000, execution of bond with sureties, daily reporting, and prohibitions on absconding or evidence tampering.

Babu Vs State by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.07.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.10025 of 2020

BABU

... Petitioner

Vs.

State Rep. by The Sub- Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Dusi, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.1311 of 2020 ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1311 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.G.Senthilkumar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz,
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R

¶11

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 430 IPC r/w Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.1311 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶12

It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner is alleged to have transported ¼ unit of river sand illegally in his bullock cart. Hence the complaint.

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶14

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of sand involved is ¼ unit. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Madras High Court Advocates Clerk Welfare Associations, Chennai (Indian Bank S/B A/c No.484077244, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157) without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶17

6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Madras High Court Advocates Clerk Welfare Associations, Chennai (Indian Bank S/B A/c No.484077244, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157), within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶18

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶19

[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the Madras High Court Advocates Clerk Welfare Associations, Chennai (Indian Bank S/B A/c No.484077244, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157) , and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

¶20

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶21

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶22

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶25

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶26

-sd/03/07/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHEYYAR, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DUSI POLICE STATION, DUSI, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 5 THE MADRAS HIGH COURT ADVOCATES CLERK WELFARE ASSOCIATIONS, CHENNAI (INDIAN BANK S/B A/C NO.484077244, IFSC CODE:IDIB000M157)

¶27

CC to M/S. K.G.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶28

CRL OP.10025/2020 Date :03/07/2020 MK:17/07/2020

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Babu v. State by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu v. State by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirumurugadinesh Vs State Rep by

Sheik Beer Vs State Rep by

Balu @ Balakrishnan Vs State Rep by

Bharathraj Vs State Rep. by

Suresh Vs State Rep by

R.N.Subramaniyan Vs State Rep by Its