Allowed

Raymond v. Anton Selva Kumar

Madras HC28 Jan 2020CRL MP(MD)/69/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench allowed a petition for suspension of sentence and bail for a petitioner convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Imposing conditions including bail money, deposit of 20% cheque value, and daily appearances, the court released the petitioner pending appeal disposal.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence and release on bail with conditions to deposit 20% of cheque value and appear daily pending appeal.

Raymond Vs Anton Selva Kumar — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.69 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of January Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) Nos.69 and 70 of 2020 IN CRL RC(MD) No.12 of 2020

¶6

RAYMOND ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN BOTH PETITIONS

¶7

¶8

ANTON SELVA KUMAR ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN BOTH PETITIONS

¶9

Prayer in CRL MP(MD)No. 69/ 2020 :

¶10

Pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence imposed in C.A.No.70 of 2018 by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli dated 04.11.2019 confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence made in C.C.No.276 of 2014 by the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, dated 26.06.2018 pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶11

Prayer in CRL MP(MD)No. 70/ 2020 :

¶12

Pleased to exempt her from undergoing the sentence imposed in C.A.No.70 of 2018 by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli dated 04.11.2019 confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence made in C.C.No.276 of 2014 by the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, dated 26.06.2018 pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶13

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.MOHAMED HANEFF, Advocate for the petitioner in both petitions and of M/s.S.Palani Velayutham, Advocate for the Respondent in both petitions, the court made the following order:-

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court for the alleged offence under Section 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act, and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and further the petitioner is directed to pay compensation of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the complainant in C.C.No.276 of 2014, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/3

¶17

CRL MP(MD) No.69 of 2020

¶18

2.The learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the Criminal Appeal No.70 of 2018, dated 04.11.2019.

¶19

3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶20

that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case and further there are contradictions in material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

¶21

4.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that there are enough materials available on record against the petitioner and prays for dismissal of this petition.

¶22

5.This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions put forward by either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶23

6.The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that certain infirmities and inconsistencies in this case and also certain contradictions in material particulars. The fact remains that there are arguable points involved in this criminal revision and further the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

¶24

7.Accordingly, the suspension of sentence petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the revision on the following conditions:-

¶25

(i) the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor;

¶26

(ii) Since the cheque amount is Rs.4,00,000/- the petitioner is directed to deposit 20% of the same i.e a sum of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand only) to the credit of C.C.No.276 of 2014, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶27

(iii) and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the said Court on daily at 10.30 a.m pending revision. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/3

¶29

CRL MP(MD) No.69 of 2020

¶30

8.The petitioner is exempted from surrendering before the trial Court for the purpose of furnishing sureties.

¶31

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

1 THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI

¶34

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR.

¶35

3 -DO-THRO- THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶36

+1 CC to M/s.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM,Advocate(SR-1776 dated 29/01/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-1802[I] dated 29/01/2020 )

¶37

vsd

¶38

ES/PN/SAR 2/29.01.2020/3P/6C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/3

Raymond v. Anton Selva Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raymond v. Anton Selva Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Vs The Executive Magistrate Cum Deputy Commissioner of Police

Duraisingam Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Pounraj Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Balamurugan Vs the Inspector of Police

M/s. Surya Plastics Vs K. Madhavan

Raja Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police