Dismissed

S.Gunasekaran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Dec 2020CRL MP(MD)/5094/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a petition sought to cancel bail granted to the second respondent. The court found no sufficient ground to interfere and directed the police to investigate an allegation of trespass by the respondent against the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

No ground found to interfere; petition dismissed with direction to First Respondent to investigate trespass allegation.

S.Gunasekaran Vs The Inspector of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.5094 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.5094 of 2020 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4327 of 2020

¶7

S.GUNASEKARAN ... PETITIONER/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT

¶8

¶9

1.STATE REP.BY

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODAL PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.10/2020 ...1ST RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶11

2.SOLAIRAJA ... 2ND RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶12

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Cancel the Bail granted to the 2nd respondent in Crl.O.P. (MD) No.4327/2020 dated 09/03/2020 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶13

Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.D.SADIQ RAJA, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 and Mr.M.PALANI, Advocate for R2, the court made the following order:-

¶14

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶15

2.This Court had granted bail to the second respondent herein on condition that he will keep away from the petitioner herein. The petitioner is the father and the second respondent is a son. The petitioner alleges that the second respondent committed trespass. But this statement does not appear to be borne out by the records. In any event, this Court has directed the first respondent to take note of the petitioner's allegation and look into it.

¶16

3.The petitioner has not made out sufficient ground for cancellation of the relief earlier granted to the second respondent herein. I find no ground to interfere.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL MP(MD) No.5094 of 2020

¶20

4.With this direction to the first respondent, this miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

sd/14/12/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

NOTE . In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned

¶23

¶24

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI.

¶25

2.DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶26

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODAL PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶27

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶28

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5094 of 2020 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4327 of 2020 Date :14/12/2020 RMI TK/PN/SAR.3/18.12.2020/2P/5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

S.Gunasekaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Gunasekaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tamarai Vs Jai Shankar

J.Amala Jessi Jaquilin Vs The Inspector of Police

Papathi Vs The Inspector of Police

Elizapath @ Mayakkal Vs Kannan

Leo Charitable Trust Vs The Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation)

Nagarajan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police