Asha v. The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a petition challenging an anticipatory bail order by recording a fresh undertaking from the accused's counsel that the court's conditions were complied with and no future defaults would occur, thereby closing the petition.
What did the court decide?
The petition challenging the anticipatory bail order was closed by recording the accused's counsel's undertaking.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL MP(MD) No.3678 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty First day of August Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
ASHA ... PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Vs
- 1 STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOLACHAL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 48 OF 2019. ... 1st RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
2 NISHANTH ... 2nd RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to CANCEL THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL order passed by this Honble Court in Crl.OP.(MD).No.3244 of 2020, dated 24.2.2020 and to pass such further or other orders.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the anticipatory bail order granted to the accused ought to be disposed of upon the accused's counsel's fresh undertaking.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASHA
- respondent
STATE
- respondent
NISHANTH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court