Partly allowed

M.Vairamuthu v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 Jun 2020CRL MP(MD)/3244/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court relaxed the monthly appearance condition imposed on the petitioner as an accused pending revision, considering his regular compliance and absence of complaints regarding witness tampering, while retaining the obligation to report as required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The condition of appearing once a month at the police station pending revision was relaxed. The petitioner shall still report as required for interrogation.

M.Vairamuthu Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.3244 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 15/06/2020

¶5

PRESENT:

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶7

CRL MP(MD). No.3244 of 2020 in CRL RC(MD). No.352 of 2020

¶8

M.Vairamuthu

¶9

... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶10

¶11

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

... Respondent/Respondent

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s. A.K.Manickam,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C

¶15

PRAYER :

¶16

To relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.M.P.(MD) No.3030 of 2020 in Crl.R.C(MD)No.352 of 2020 dt.13/05/2020

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :

¶18

The petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in CRL RC(MD)No.352 of 2020.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in CRL RC(MD) No.352 of 2020 on 15/06/2020 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶20

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶21

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

CRL MP(MD). No.3244 of 2020

¶24

the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this court in CRL RC(MD) No.352 of 2020 on 15/06/2020 is relaxed as under:

¶25

“The petitioner/ Accused shall appear before the respondent police once in a month (i.e.) on the first day of every English Calendar month at 10:30 a.m., pending revision.”

¶26

However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶27

/ TRUE COPY /

¶28

/ /2020

¶29

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶30

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utlised for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

¶33

VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶34

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI.

¶35

-DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICILA MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶36

THE SUPERINTENDENT,

¶37

CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

¶38

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVAKASI TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶39

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶40

STS

¶41

TE/JC/SAR-III : 17/06/2020 : 2P/7C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

2/2

M.Vairamuthu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Vairamuthu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Vaithiyalingam Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Muthu Irulandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Dhanuskodi Vs The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption

T.Salomon Durairaj Vs E.Jerry Cardoza

Nadarajan Vs The Inspector of Police

Loganathan Vs The Inspector of Police