Allowed

Paneerselvam v. State Rep.by

Madras HC29 Oct 2020CRL MP/6511/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, hearing a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, allowed amendment of the cause title to correct a clerical error in the petitioner's name and granted two weeks to execute sureties. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Amendment of cause title permitted; two weeks time granted to execute sureties; failure to comply results in automatic dismissal.

Paneerselvam Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 29.10.2020

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020
in
Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020
1.Pannirselvam
S/o.Sammatham
2.Madhavi
W/o.Pannirselvam ..Petitioners
Vs.
State Represented By
The Inspector of Police,
Crime Branch CID
Thiruvannamalai Unit
Thiruvannamalai District
Crime No.1 of 2020 .. Respondent

¶7

PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to extend the time granted to execute the bond and sureties in Crime No.1 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police in Crl.O.P No.5182 of 2020 dated 10.09.2020.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.Aruna Elango

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

1/4

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

This petition has been filed to extend the time to execute the bond and sureties in Crime No.1 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police in Crl.O.P No.5182 of 2020 dated 10.09.2020.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020 dated 10.09.2020 with some conditions. She would further submit that in the petition for anticipatory bail, instead of mentioning 1^st petitioner's father name as Pannirselvam, S/o.Sammatham, it was inadvertently mentioned as Paneer Selvam, S/o.Sampth and hence, she prays to amend the cause title and also prays to extend the time to execute the sureties.

¶17

Heard both sides.

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, amendment is ordered as prayed for

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioners to surrender and

¶20

2/4

¶21

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶22

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020

¶23

execute the sureties as ordered by this Court, from the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶24

29.10.2020
Internet:Yes
Index:Yes/No
uma
Note: Registry is directed to make necessary amendment in the order
dated 10.09.2020.
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I,
Thiruvannamalai.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Crime Branch CID
Thiruvannamalai Unit
Thiruvannamalai District
Crime No.1 of 2020
3.The Public Prosecutor
High Court of Madras
Chennai

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

3/4

¶27

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020

¶28

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶29

uma

¶30

Crl.M.P.No.6511 of 2020
in Crl.O.P.No.5182 of 2020

¶31

29.10.2020

¶32

4/4

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

Paneerselvam v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paneerselvam v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivaguru Vs the State Rep by

Balamurugan Vs State Rep.by

Aakash Vs the State Rep.by

K.Iywin Vs State Rep by

Agilan Vs State Inspector of Police

Anbu@Anbarasan Vs State Represented by