Partly allowed

Dinesh Kumar v. the State by

Madras HC28 Sept 2020CRL MP/5800/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition was filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to relax a condition requiring the petitioner to report daily to the police. The High Court modified the condition, ordering the petitioner to appear before the police only every Monday instead of daily.

What did the court decide?

The condition of daily reporting is relaxed; the petitioner is ordered to appear before the police every Monday at 10.30 a.m.

Dinesh Kumar Vs the State by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.09.2020

¶3

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶4

Crl.M.P.No.5800 of 2020

¶5

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.13556 of 2020

¶7

Dinesh Kumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
State Represented by its ... Respondent
The Inspector of Police,
Paravakottai Police Station
Thiruvarur District
Cr.No.858 of 2020.

¶8

Prayer : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 03.09.2020 made in Crl.O.P No.13556 of 2020 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.Swami Subramaniam

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz

¶11

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶14

This petition has been filed for relaxation of the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13556 of 2020 dated 03.09.2020, that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13556 of 2020 on 03.09.2020, regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶16

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶17

Considering the above submissions, the condition imposed as against the petitioner by this Court in Crl.O.P No.13556 of 2020 dated 03.09.2020, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every Monday at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶18

Accordingly,this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

28/09/2020

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
NO.II, MANNARGUDI, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVARUR. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

¶25

C.C. to M/S. SWAMI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶26

Order

¶27

in CRL MP.5800/2020

¶28

in CRL OP.13556/2020 Date :28/09/2020

¶29

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TA-07/10/2020

Dinesh Kumar v. the State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar v. the State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs the State Rep by

Raja Vs State Rep by

Murali Vs State Rep by

Kumar @ Krishnasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Saravanan Vs State Rep.by

Dinesh @ Pambu Dinesh Vs the State Rep.by