Partly allowed

Jeeva Jothi v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC9 Sept 2020CRL MP/5016/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought relaxation of bail conditions requiring them to report to police every Monday and Friday. The Court modified the condition to require reporting only on the first working day of every month while keeping other conditions intact.

What did the court decide?

Condition to report police every Monday and Friday modified to report on first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m.

Jeeva Jothi Vs the State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 09.09.2020

¶3

Coram

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.M.P.No.5016 of 2020

¶6

in Crl.M.P.No.3162 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.837 of 2020

¶7

Jeeva Jothi 2. Rajamanickam …Petitioners

¶8

Vs. The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Erumapatty Police Station, Tamil Nadu – 637 020. (Crime No.198 of 2019) …Respondent

¶9

Prayer: This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to relax the conditional order “the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m., dated 11.03.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.3162 of 2020 in Cr.No.198 of 2019.

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Jayaraman For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(This case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3162 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.837 of 2020 dated 11.03.2020, “the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m.,

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been complying with the conditions regularly and hence, he seeks for relaxation of the condition.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that the petitioners have been complying with the the conditions.

¶16

Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.3162 of 2020 in Crl.O.P.No.837 of 2020 dated 11.03.2020 is modified to the effect that the petitioners are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ directed to report before the respondent police on 1^st working day of

¶17

every month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The other conditions imposed shall remain unaltered.

¶18

With the above directions, this criminal original petition is ordered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

09/09/2020

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, NAMAKKAL, TAMIL NADU.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAMAKKAL [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERUMAPATTY POLICE STATION, TAMILNADU-637020.

¶27

5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL.

¶28

C.C. to M/S.T.JAYARAMARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶29

Order

¶30

in CRL MP.5016/2020 in CRL.MP.3162/2020

¶31

in CRL OP.837/2020

¶32

Date :09/09/2020

¶33

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ cs 24/09/2020

Jeeva Jothi v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeeva Jothi v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivachanthiran Vs the State Rep.by

Kulanthaivelu Vs State Rep. by

Manikandan Vs the State Rep by

M.a.Sivanandam Vs Staterep by

Venkatesan @ Jilla Venkatesan Vs State Represented by

Selvaraj Vs the State Rep. by