Allowed

Iyappan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC25 Aug 2020CRL MP/3731/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted the suspension of sentence and bail to the petitioner, convicted under Section 304(II) IPC, pending the disposal of his appeal. The order imposed conditions including the execution of a bond with sureties and appearance before the trial court. Reasoning included the length of incarceration and the likelihood of delay in the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail with conditions including executing a bond with two sureties and appearing before the trial court on the first working day of every month.

Iyappan Vs State Rep.by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.08.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.M.P.No.3731 of 2020

¶6

¶7

Crl.A.No.205 of 2020

¶8

Iyappan .. Petitioner/Accused

¶9

Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, J-3, Guindy Law and Order Police Station, Chennai. .. Respondent/Complainant

¶10

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 30.04.2019 passed in S.C.No.339 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Court, Chennai and to enlarge the petitioner on bail till the disposal of the appeal.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Maniprabhu

¶12

For Respondent: Mr.K.Madhan

¶13

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

This case is taken up through video conferencing.

¶15

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been preferred seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 30.04.2019 passed in S.C.No.339 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Court, Chennai and to enlarge the petitioner on bail till the disposal of the appeal.

¶16

The petitioner, who was an accused in S.C.No.339 of 2015 before the III Additional Sessions Court, Chennai, was convicted of the offence under Section 304(II) IPC and sentenced to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo two months rigorous imprisonment.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Challenging the above conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed Crl.A.No.205 of 2020 along with the instant miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.

¶19

Heard Mr.G.Maniprabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Madhan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent/State.

¶20

It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was the driver of the vehicle, which was used to transport various articles to hotel Ganesh Bhavan, where, the deceased Shankar was working as Security Guard. There used to be frequent petty quarrels between the petitioner and Shankar during delivery of the articles at Ganesh Bhavan. On 24.06.2015, around 5.30 p.m., while the petitioner was delivering idly batter, a quarrel ensued, in which, it is alleged that the petitioner had assaulted Shankar with a rod, which proved fatal.

¶21

On these allegations, the petitioner faced prosecution in S.C.No.339 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 302 and 506(II) IPC and was eventually acquitted of the charges under Sections 294(b), 302 and 506(II) IPC, but, convicted of the offence under Section 304(II) IPC and sentenced as stated supra.

¶22

The petitioner has raised substantial grounds in the appeal which require detailed appraisal. Moreover, the petitioner has been in incarceration from 30.04.2019. Further, the appeal is not likely to be taken up in the near future. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to the relief of suspension of sentence and bail.

¶23

Accordingly, the relief of suspension of sentence and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the III Additional Sessions Court, Chennai;

¶24

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the III Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; and

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on

¶27

(iii) the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court.

¶28

-sd/-
25/08/2020
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 III ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
JUDGE, CHENNAI.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
J-3 GUINDY LAW AND ORDER POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
4 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL,
CHENNAI
C.C. to M/S.G.MANIPRABHU Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CRL MP.3731/2020
in
CRL A.205/2020

¶29

Date :25/08/2020

¶30

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶31

RVR 09/09/2020

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Iyappan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iyappan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uikkatan Vs State Represented by

Selvaraj Vs State Rep.by

Chithra Vs the State Represented by

Sekar, 60 Yrs, Vs State Rep by

Loganathan Vs State Rep by

Muthu @ Muthukumar @ Muthukumarasamy Vs State Represented by