Allowed

Karthi@ Karthikeyan v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC1 Jul 2020CRL MP/3183/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition to suspend his life imprisonment and other sentences pending disposal of his appeal. The High Court found arguable points in the appeal and ordered suspension of the imprisonment sentence, subject to execution of a bond and monthly reporting.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment was suspended on execution of a bond for Rs.10,000 and reporting to the court monthly.

Karthi@ Karthikeyan Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.07.2020

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3183 of 2020

¶7

Karthi @ Karthikeyan, S/o Balasundharam ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

The State, Represented by The Inspector Of Police Town Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No.825 of 2012 ... Respondent

¶10

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Criminal Procedure Code, to suspend the sentence passed by the Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court) Villupuram, in Sessions Case No.298 of 2013 dated 04.01.2019 be suspended pending disposal of the appeal.

¶11

The petitioner is the sole accused in S.C.No.298 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Villupuram. The trial Court by judgment dated 04.01.2019, convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months; convicted him under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of

¶12

Rs.3,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and convicted him under Section 506(ii) IPC, sentenced him to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and ordered the sentences to run concurrently. Seeking to suspend the sentence, the present petition has been filed.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was having a dispute with his father. The deceased and P.W.2 came to the place of occurrence to diffuse the situation. The petitioner is stated to have attacked P.W.2 and thereafter the deceased.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is no motive that has been established as against the deceased. The deceased was in inebriated condition. Post-mortem certificate coupled with the evidence of Doctor would clearly substantiate the same. There was a wordy quarrel. Considering the above coupled with the period of incarceration, the sentence will have to be suspended as there are arguable points available in the appeal.

¶15

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submitted that there is an injured witness in the form of P.W.2. The deceased was drunk cannot be a factor to suspend the sentence. Not only the deceased but also the petitioner was drunk. Therefore, this petition will have to be dismissed.

¶16

The petitioner has been under incarceration from the month of January 2019 onwards. Thus, he is under incarceration for about 1 ½ years. We do find the existence of arguable points in the appeal. It is a case where both the petitioner and the deceased were drunk. There appears to be wordy quarrel.

¶17

Thus, considering the above, we are inclined to suspend the sentence. Accordingly, the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended on condition that the petitioner executes his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the concerned Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. pending appeal.

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)

¶21

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
(FAST TRACK COURT), VILLUPURAM,
2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
NO.I,VILLUPURAM,
3 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON,CUDDALORE
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
TALUK POLICE STATION,
VILLUPURAM DISTRCT
C.C. to M/S. S.SARAVANA KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CRL MP.3183/2020
IN CRL.A.NO.174 OF 2020
Date :01/07/2020
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
rd 21/07/2020

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Karthi@ Karthikeyan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthi@ Karthikeyan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Majeed Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Moideen Salman@ Sembo Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Ajmal Ibrahim Vs State of Tamil Nadu

C.Sakthivel Vs the Superintendent of Police

Paulraj Vs the Principal Secretary

Ganesan Vs the Principal Secretary