5.Both the appeals were heard together. After a careful perusal of the entire evidence on record, I indicated to the learned counsel for the appellant, that I am not inclined to interfere with the acquittals, I was inclined to confirm the conviction imposed on the appellant. It is also seen that the male born to the appellant/Senthil @ Senthilkumar is with the defacto complainant. The defacto complainant and his wife appeared before this Court through web hearing and informed through their counsel/Mr.Jothi Basu that considering the various aspects, they would not have any objection, if there is modification in the matter of sentence provided, the appellant pays a compensation of Rs.9,00,000/- for the maintenance of the child. The appellant also admits that he would not challenge the finding of guilt and he would be satisfied if indulgence is shown in the matter of sentence. The appellant appears to have been in custody for nearly four months. The appellant gives a further undertaking that he would take demand draft for a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- favouring the defacto complainant / Mr.Vasandanathan and pay the same directly to him within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. He would make a further a payment of Rs.2,00,000/- within a period of one year thereafter. In other words, within a period of 18 months, a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- will be paid to the defacto complainant.
